Facebook recently told me that I needed to convert my personal account into a “content creator” account. Why? I have no idea.
As a minor show of rebellion, I changed my work title on there to “discontent creator.” Because I refuse to define my work as “content.”
I hate that word.
To the current culture, a novel is content. A film or documentary is content. A poem is content. A painting is content. A thoughtful essay is content. A comedy sketch is content. A cat falling off a table is content as long as a camera is running.
The word treats all of those things as interchangeable cogs in a system whose purpose is to capture attention long enough for someone to show ads. I don’t object to someone making money, but I do object to a soulless system which offers no real value for the attention it steals.
I don’t want to create content.
I want to write.
I want to make films.
I want to create images.
I want to communicate ideas and feelings.
I want to create connections with others.
Those distinctions matter.
Some people vaguely object to social media “content” because it’s poor quality slop, but that’s far too simplistic.

Miss. church turns back clock by refusing to marry black couple
Son’s prayer for dying mother awakened emotion for NYC doc
Need for certainty is an internal tyranny that leads to the wrong path
Love & Hope — Episode 11:
FRIDAY FUNNIES
AUDIO: Drama of ‘family of origin’ seems to follow us for a lifetime
For a culture where God is dead, spiritual emergence is madness
Could Hillary Clinton be the next president of the United States?
World is an insane roller coaster and I need this insanity to stop